What I've loved about the first half of the IPL

The Bumrah-AB-Kohli Super Over, Tewatia’s feats, Pooran’s catch, and more

Mark Nicholas12-Oct-2020It came home to me in the Super Over. Not the one that resulted from the Kings XI Punjab effectively drowning themselves in a sea of misadventure against the Delhi Capitals but the one when Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers had to make eight runs for the Royal Challengers Bangalore against Jasprit Bumrah’s Mumbai Indians. Eight runs, pah!These are three exceptional cricketers; in the case of the two RCB batsmen, among the best there have been, ever. Bumrah is somewhere near the height of his powers: young and fast enough to be a genuine threat, old enough to know what to do with it. That he is unorthodox is a boon for the game that needs its many interpretations.ALSO READ: Bumrah vs de Villiers, an IPL battle for the agesBumrah slipped de Villiers two decidedly slippery bouncers in their Super Over, one that shot past his nose, and one that flew from the flailing edge of his bat to the long-leg boundary. That was four of the eight right there – lucky. Kohli pulled a ball from back of a length that would have made a hole in an advertising board but picked out the fielder at deep backward square. It was a shot that, if not exactly heard around the world, changed his IPL. Later in the over he flicked an attempted yorker off his toes and the match was done and dusted. Virat and ABD were never not going to manage eight runs, but Jasprit made them think and fight tooth and nail. This drama lasted five minutes, that’s all, but it was five minutes on another level. It came after Kieron Pollard’s onslaught – 60 from 24 balls – gave Mumbai another even-money crack at a game they had long lost. It was kind of mad but immense fun, everyone on the edge of their seats in wonderment. The five minutes of the Super Over alone crystallised what this whole thing is about.The IPL is surprising, stimulating and on speed. Most of the elite are here, and when they go at each other, they do so as if they are in the ring, trading blows in the name of franchises that have become an integral part of Indian life. Yes, their bank balances improve to often unimaginable levels but most take the vow and perform. What’s not to like?Kohli gets his groove back
Kohli said that pull shot was a relief, given he had barely located the middle of his bat since the tournament began. He had put too much pressure on himself, he added, the corollary of which was that he was tight and, in desperation, simply trying too hard to influence every moment of every match. One over, to be bowled by a serious opponent and in which he faced only three deliveries, reminded him to loosen up and watch the ball, only the ball. He hit the shot so well, it became a eureka moment. He hasn’t looked back since.ALSO READ: Virat Kohli after ending his rut: ‘I love this game and hate it too’On Saturday Kohli played one of those innings for which he is famous – the slow build and the quick strike. His way is that of the hunter and his prey knows the odds only too well. In his first 30 balls on a sluggish and two-paced pitch, he eked out 34 runs; in the next 22 he smashed 56. He never blocked and he never slogged, he just did what he does: he outplayed his opponent.Beyond the boundary: Nicholas Pooran makes an incredible save during a match against the Rajasthan Royals in Sharjah•BCCIFunny how even the greats have doubts, fears even. There is something of Novak Djokovic in Kohli: in the abhorrence at anything less than the ticking of every box. Having done so, they see themselves as pre-eminent and delight in asking their opponent what he’s got and how long for. On these pages four years ago, Ed Smith wrote a brilliant piece about the development of modern batting. It’s a must read if the link between art and science, body and mind in the act of sporting performance is to be fully appreciated. “Kohli’s investment in success is total and self-reinforcing – hard work, desire and self-belief loop back into each other,” wrote Smith. “Like Djokovic, Kohli has turned his body into an agent of that self-belief; a body dedicated to a game that is dedicated to success.” Smith might well have added “mind” to “body”. He wrote that each man “combines fierce and literal determination with hints of mysticism – if you want something enough and commit to it sufficiently, good things will happen.”Early in the tournament, it was clear that during the long days of lockdown Kohli had driven himself to excess but had forgotten how to let go of the expectation that came from it. To bat well again, he had to let go. Put another way, he had to be free. The pull stroke off Bumrah was the key to the door of freedom.Nicholas Pooran’s miracle save
It might not have been completed in the old days because the boundary was often a picket fence, an iron railing, an advertising board, or a rope with spectators sitting on the grass beyond. I watched the 1967 Gillette Cup Final at Lord’s from behind that rope and in front of the Tavern. The players of Somerset and Kent signed autographs but definitely did not go leaping into and out of the crowd to pull off the double whammy on a boundary catch. Why? Because no one had thought of it, simple. Alan Knott would surely have played the ramp and reverse had they been invented. Colin Cowdrey might not have done.Pooran’s effort was beyond brilliant. It was magical, really, causing a general dropping of the jaw and deep intakes of breath, followed by “We gotta see that again!” And again, and again. Pooran is a wonderful athlete, or contortionist should we say in this instance, and has a lovely instinct for cricket, as if the game is in his blood. Keep an eye on him with the bat by the way, there is a rare talent in this fellow.Rahul Tewatia…
…was at it once more on Sunday, and by that, I mean dragging the Rajasthan Royals’ more celebrated batsmen out of the mire. Steve Smith looks strangely rudderless at the crease, as if his strong mind needed a break and it has come in the form of carefree swings at the ball that might or might not come off. This is high-tariff cricket, not usually his thing. One imagines he will work it out soon enough and that one of Jos Buttler and Ben Stokes will sprinkle some stardust over the Royals in the coming days and weeks.ALSO READ: Rahul Tewatia and the romance of the struggleMeantime, hail Tewatia, the man who surely saw the other side during the excruciating first part of his innings against the Kings XI at Sharjah. Watching, you felt the world wincing with you – indeed, someone said he should walk past a straight one and save himself the humiliation, but oh ye of little faith.The rest is history. Tewatia played the innings of his life, which probably saved him from a fate worse than death. He played another little gem on Sunday afternoon, easing the Royals over the line with his rather charming brand of off-side elegance and leg-side wipes.Tewatia is the feel-good factor of the tournament – an unlikely hero but a hero all the same. He gave us all hope that day in Sharjah, reminding cricketers the world over that the game is our gift and that to give it away is never an option.Shreyas Iyer (left) and Prithvi Shaw: two of several attractive batsmen in the IPL•BCCIOn the subject of feel-good…
Young Indian batsmen with good technique and enviable flair: Devdutt Padikkal, Mayank Agarwal, Sanju Samson, Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant, Prithvi Shaw, Ishan Kishan, and Shreyas Iyer. Proper fast bowlers not afraid to let the white ball fly: Jofra Archer, Pat Cummins, Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortje, and of course, the boy Bumrah. Wristspinners going well on pitches that make life less easy for them than they are used to when under the pump. Oh, and David Warner and Jonny Bairstow, an Australian and an Englishman on the field together and in cahoots.The yorker, or absence of it
You’d think the coaches would work their bowlers to the blister in search of a consistent yorker when the slog is on. Perhaps it’s harder said than done in these days of invention. On Sunday Sandeep Sharma bowled a good one to Riyan Parag, who ramped/scooped it over Bairstow’s head to the boundary. I mean, please. Having said that, I’m convinced the yorker should be a default position.Even more feel-good
The Delhi Capitals chairman and co-owner surprised the team by calling an impromptu meeting saying he wanted to show them a video about the past, rather unsuccessful, week.Instead, the video was a collage of family messages to each of the players from their homes all over the world – wives, girlfriends, kids, mums, more kids, dads and dogs. Even Ricky Ponting shows emotion (insert laugh emoji). He then makes a nice speech about the sacrifices involved with three months in the IPL bubble. It confirmed the feeling I have had that the IPL is less mercenary than it appears from afar and that the players mainly buy into the “family” that has paid their asking price.

As if to emphasise this, yesterday there were a couple of shots on television that told the story well. With eight needed from the final over, the camera picked up Shane Warne on a balcony above the Royals dugout. The Covid mask had slipped down his face and we saw him close his eyes and mouth to himself something like “C’mon, please, this time, please.” It was a prayer of sorts. Warne is a Royals mentor, low-grade stuff after the glory days of leading the team to the title in the IPL’s first, barnstorming year.Only a couple of hours later, Harshal Patel bowled too straight at Suryakumar Yadav, who worked him off middle and leg to the square boundary. Ponting looked daggers. Harshal had missed his mark by three inches. But Ponting cares. So too Warne. And their bar is set high.Finally
Credit big time those who have dressed the grounds, curated the audio and created an atmosphere from nothing. It really does fell like the real thing, albeit in a different space.Finally, finally
The absence of spectators means that the cricket has taken centre stage. Confirming the quality of that cricket is no bad thing. Much as we love the bling, the cricket is the thing.

Sri Lanka's 135 all out: Anatomy of a collapse

What was going on inside Sri Lanka’s dressing room on the first day of the Galle Test?

Andrew Fidel Fernando14-Jan-2021Ah, hello guys. How are you? Happy new year, , happy new year. Come, come. Dressing room is there, just straight and to the left. I think Asitha said he was going to bring the match ball and the stumps for us. He’s the newest guy in the team, no? So obviously I’m going to give him the job nobody wants.Do you have all your gear? No-one has forgotten anything? Everyone has their own box today? Wow, nice pads Thirimanne! New? Where from? No matter what anybody says, buddy, you’re always the sharpest-looking player on the field, ah. Remember that 31 you made two weeks ago? Never seen a better 31 bro, honestly.You know what, you should open the innings. No, I’m serious. Dimuth called just this morning and said he can’t come today. That guy is too serious anyway. It’s all you Thiri. And hey, Kusal Perera… Mr. 153… you can also open, right? You guys go together. Two lefties. Like Justin Langer and Matthew Hayden.I’m feeling good about today guys. Back on our home ground after a while. Yes, we got hammered in the last two games, but that was away from home. We’re a different team on our own pitch. Yes, OK, so we also lost to this opposition last time we were here. But we fired that coach, remember? It’s fine.Related

  • Joe Root posts majestic 228 but Lahiru Thirimanne stands firm to give SL hope of saving Test

  • Timely Joe Root century sees England tighten their grip

  • Wasteful SL skittled for 135 as England take control

  • Bess admits 'I didn't feel like I bowled very well'

  • Normal service for SA as collapse exposes familiar faultlines

Boys, look at that perfect forward defence from Thiri. I knew it was the right choice to play him again and have him open the innings, guys. Someone was telling me there are these guys doing well in the lower level doing really well. I don’t know, man, some Pathum Nissanka or someone. But we’ve all seen Thiri’s glorious cover drive, right? Bent-kneed, just like Kumar Sangakkara. Their fast bowlers won’t know what to do. I know he’s barely started, but look how correct that shot is.Oh, he’s out? But how? He’s middled that shot, still! He’s flicked it straight to the sneaky leg slip they’ve put in. Can’t fault the batsman there, guys, the only thing he didn’t do was take into account the trap they’ve laid for him. Hard luck, Thiri. Yah, I know you’ve only hit one fifty in the last 18 innings you’ve played, but you’ll come good, everybody knows that – your technique is great. And anyway, look at that – you blocked enough of their fast bowlers out that they have their spinners on already. This guy, Dominic Bess or something, hasn’t even played on these kinds of pitches before. Obviously we’re going to smash him., is Kusal Perera out now? Must have dozed off. Playing the reverse-sweep? It’s OK, KJP, that’s the shot that gets you so many runs also, isn’t it? That’s fine, you tried it today against this Bess character, and fair enough, he hasn’t played here before so we can do what we like against him. It’s just the way you play. Everybody remembers innings. Relax. Our two most-experienced batsmen are in now. We’ll get 200 and roll them over on this pitch with our spinners guys, just watch. OK, Mathews and Chandimal are also out playing their shots. That must mean it’s a difficult pitch, right, if even those guys are failing? Our bowlers are going to go wild.Kusal Perera reverse-sweeps Dom Bess… straight to slip•SLCAh, Mr. Niroshan Dickwella… Dikka. Why don’t you go out and get us out of this mess? Just play your shots. They still have this Bess on, what a joke. Can he even turn it? Look at this terrible ball he has bowled! It might bounce twice before getting to the keeper. Oh, no. Dikka – you’ve hit it straight to point. OK but to be fair, wide long-hops can be hard to deal with . They arrive so much later than you think – you really have to wait for them. Maybe that’s not your thing?Ah, now Hasaranga has also got out playing a reverse-sweep to this Bess. It must be a killer pitch if even he’s getting wickets. This score looks low now guys, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we get a big first-innings lead here.So now that we’re all out, what are the takeaways from that innings? Yes, we definitely could have been slightly more selective with our shots. OK, I hear what you’re saying – when you nail a reverse-sweep against the turn early in your innings, what could demoralise an a team more? I mean, some would say a total of 135 is demoralising, but we’re talking about the opposition.And look, a lot of us were unlucky. Look at Dasun Shanaka getting caught off the boot of short leg. And Lasith Embuldeniya getting run out from a deflection off the bowler’s hand. We had really bad luck today.And also what a fantastic-looking 4 off 22 balls from Thirimanne, right? Guy has potential.

Prithvi Shaw or Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant or Wriddhiman Saha – pick your India XI for first Test

And who will accompany Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Shami in the bowling department?

Sidharth Monga14-Dec-2020As India travel from Sydney to Adelaide, a few selection questions will be on top of their minds. The middle-order batsmen – Cheteshwar Pujara, Virat Kohli, Ajinkya Rahane and Hanuma Vihari – and the two fast bowlers – Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Shami – select themselves, but the other five positions are open with equally reasonable arguments for the various options available.OpenersMayank Agarwal and Prithvi Shaw are the incumbents, but India didn’t get a single significant partnership at the top the last time India played a series, in New Zealand. The outsider is Shubman Gill, who will be making his Test debut should he play. All three have batted positively in the warm-ups even though Shaw managed just one decent knock in four innings. The last time they batted, Agarwal and Gill both looked good for hundreds, but the SCG pitch had eased out significantly by then.WicketkeeperAt least for the first Test, the middle order is sealed. Rishabh Pant is India’s incumbent wicketkeeper and No. 7 as India have preferred him to Wriddhiman Saha in series outside Asia. The logic for Saha’s inclusion in home Tests is to provide the spinners with a more accomplished gloveman. Pant has been India’s wicketkeeper on their last three tours outside Asia: England, Australia and New Zealand. On the last of those tours, Saha was fit and available. However, Pant has been losing favour gradually this year. It will be interesting to see if that extends to Tests too.Last two bowlersBumrah and Shami are sure to play, leaving the final two bowling slots open. R Ashwin has started India’s last three tours outside Asia and should be the favourite, except there is a fair chance India might not play a spinner. Spin has averaged 49 runs per wicket in day-night Tests in Australia, and that is despite a superlative average of 25 for the home spinner Nathan Lyon. So it won’t be unreasonable if India choose not to play one. If India do play, Ravindra Jadeja is out of the equation, and Ashwin’s competition is left-arm wristspinner Kuldeep Yadav, who took a five-for the last time he played in Australia, prompting the coach to say he was the No. 1 choice in overseas Tests.Umesh Yadav has to be the favourite as the third fast bowler: he looked good in the first tour game, has been the No. 4 behind Ishant Sharma, Bumrah and Shami for a long time now and has the experience of bowling in a day-night Test before. The other options are Navdeep Saini and Mohammed Siraj, both yet to play a Test.

Stats – Joe Root bosses it in Asia again

Stats highlights from the first day of the Test between India and England in Chennai

ESPNcricinfo stats team05-Feb-20217 Centuries for Joe Root in the last 15 innings when he has scored a fifty. Excluding the one against West Indies at Old Trafford in 2018, when he remained unbeaten on 68, his conversion rate to hundreds is 50%. Out of the 54 times he had made a fifty before that, Root had hit 13 centuries, a conversion rate of 25% (excluding two unbeaten fifties). Among batsmen who have hit at least 10 fifty-plus scores since September 2018, no batsman has had a better conversion rate than Root. Kane Williamson (six hundreds out of 12) and Henry Nicholls (five hundreds out of 10) are the other batsmen to convert 50% their fifties to centuries in that period.7 Successive Tests in India in which Root has got at least one fifty-plus score. Javed Miandad is the only batsman who had a better run (8). Alvin Kallicharan and VVS Laxman are the other batsmen with seven fifties in seven Tests in India.ESPNcricinfo Ltd8 Batsmen including Root who have hit a century in three consecutive Test matches in Asia. Hashim Amla was the last batsman to do so; he had scores of 253* in the Nagpur Test in 2010, then 114 and 123* in Kolkata in the next Test, and 80 and 118* against Pakistan in Dubai in the first Test of his next tour to Asia. Ken Barrington is the only other England batsman among the eight.9 Batsmen who have hit a century in their 100th Test. Root is the third England batsman to do so after Colin Cowdrey and Alec Stewart. Ricky Ponting is the only one to hit two hundreds in his 100th Test.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2012 The last time a visiting team in India put on a 200-run partnership. Ian Bell and Jonathan Trott had added 208 runs for the fourth wicket in the third innings of the Nagpur Test. The last 200-plus stand in the first innings of a Test in India by an away team was in 2010, when Amla and Alviro Petersen added 209 runs for the third wicket in Kolkata. Dom Sibley and Root recorded only the 14th instance of a visiting team putting on a 200-run partnership in the first innings of a Test in India.17 Tests played by Jasprit Bumrah before his first one at home. Excluding Pakistan players who debuted in the mid-2000s and had to play their ‘home’ Tests at neutral venues in the UAE, this is the longest any player has gone before playing his first Test at home. West Indies’ Daren Ganga also played 17 Test matches before playing his first home Test match.ESPNcricinfo Ltd3.87 The combined economy rate of Shahbaz Nadeem and Washington Sundar – India’s fourth and fifth bowling options – in this innings so far. Between them the two bowlers bowled 32 overs and conceded 20 out of the 30 boundaries hit in the day. The other bowlers – Bumrah, Ishant Sharma and R Ashwin – returned a combined economy rate of 2.34 from 57.3 overs.

Ishant Sharma – from unlucky workhorse to master quick

The career of only the second Indian fast bowler to reach 100 Tests is a truly fascinating one, and we are witnessing its best chapter

Karthik Krishnaswamy22-Feb-20212:14

Manjrekar on Ishant’s 300: A ‘unique career’ for India’s dependable ‘workhorse’

In a Test match where 40 wickets fell in the space of 1775 legal deliveries, it’s a bit of a conceit to term a non-wicket-taking ball, one that the batsman played with relative comfort off the middle of his bat, the ball of the match, but let’s do it anyway.Day four, second Test, Chepauk. Ishant Sharma to Joe Root, the 35th over of England’s second innings. This is the first over of a new spell for Ishant, and he’s immediately got the ball to reverse. For the first five balls, it’s all inswing. It isn’t big, booming, boomeranging inswing, but it’s accurate: on a good length, attacking the stumps, with a strong leg-side field to enable that line. Root’s defensive technique has to be on point against all five balls, and it is.Related

Anatomy of Motera: How the Sardar Patel Stadium became cricket's largest ever

Virat Kohli on Ishant Sharma: '100 Tests for a fast bowler is as good as 150 Tests for a batsman'

Kohli on 'dear friend' Ishant: 'To play 100 Tests for a fast bowler is as good as 150 Tests for a batsman'

Ishant Sharma ahead of 100th Test: Winning WTC will be the same feeling as winning the World Cup

India's pink-ball conundrum: Kuldeep, Hardik, Siraj or Sundar?

The sixth ball is our candidate for ball of the match. Again, Ishant hits the perfect length – it may have drawn other batsmen forward but Root trusts his back-foot game more than most – and this time it reverses the other way. A slow-motion replay reveals all the detail: the shiny side faces outwards, and the seam is canted towards fine leg, like it would be for a conventional inswinger, except it’s reversing now and it leaves the right-hand batsman. The ball swings late, starting just before it hits the pitch, and straightens towards the top of off stump.Root’s response confirms what we know already. He is one of the world’s top four or five batsmen. He picks the length early, and probably picks the direction of swing early too, noting which way the shiny side is oriented as soon as the ball leaves the bowler’s hand. He plays it late, getting right behind what’s known in the business as the “second line”, and defends towards short extra cover.No wickets, no runs, and ESPNcricinfo’s scorers record the batsman as having been in control. It’s a brilliant delivery, but it’s an in-between sort of delivery, the sort that doesn’t make the highlights packages, not even the longer ones that include plays-and-misses.Six in-between balls, adding up to one in-between over. These are the bits that go into making a fast bowler world-class. The Ishant Sharma of February 2021, 32 years old and about to play his 100th Test match, is a master of the in-between ball and the in-between over.Ishant Sharma has learned to test batsmen every single ball•Ryan Pierse/Getty ImagesA master? Well, you’d have to be that to average 22.91 since the start of 2016. Or 19.34 since the start of 2018 – better than Pat Cummins, better than James Anderson, better than pretty much anyone you can name other than Jason Holder.For much of his career, of course, Ishant wasn’t a master of anything, least of all his own fate. For the longest time, he was, to both his defenders and his detractors, unlucky Ishant. Tall, gangly, with unruly hair, a prominent Adam’s apple, an odd, endearing stutter at the finish of his action, and no luck at all. Unlucky Ishant, always bowling good balls and making batsmen look uncomfortable, but seldom actually getting them out.Split Ishant’s 99-Test career into thirds, and you kind of see why he gave this impression. In each 33-Test chunk, batsmen have managed virtually the same control percentage against him, a few decimal points either side of 80. And yet, look at those averages – from Test 34 (Dominica, 2011) to Test 66 (Bengaluru, 2015), he averaged 41.34. Since then, he’s averaged 23.42, with barely any change in how often he’s drawn uncontrolled responses from batsmen.

So what’s changed? Well, two things.First, Ishant stopped bowling bad balls, and for a time he became India’s workhorse: a tireless deliverer of thankless overs, able to control the flow of runs without necessarily looking like he’d run through teams. He did a job for his captains, a job for which he was valued, and through which he became the one unchanging cog in an imperfect attack, the most experienced member of a fast-bowling group that was still finding its way in Test cricket.On back-to-back tours of South Africa, New Zealand, England and Australia from December 2013 to January 2015, Ishant took 43 wickets in ten Tests at 35.00. Not particularly impressive, you’d think, but only one India bowler managed a better average in that period, and no one had a better strike rate than his 60.8. He also took more five-fors (three) than anyone else.The second transformation was in the nature of his good balls: they became more potent. He began going wider of the crease to make batsmen play more often, and in doing so rediscovered – according to Bharat Arun, India’s bowling coach – the wrist position that allowed him to swing the ball again. He also found a way, with the help of Jason Gillespie at Sussex, to bowl fuller while still hitting the pitch hard.And he kept getting fitter and stronger, in better shape to maintain his hostility over multiple spells. His action grew smoother, and his body more balanced and stable at the crease, allowing him to bowl with just as much venom from all sorts of angles, turning him into a terror to left-hand batsmen from around the wicket. Just look at him square up Dawid Malan and Ben Stokes here.Left-handers beware: Ishant Sharma has nailed the art of picking up their edges•Mark Brake/Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesIn doing all this, Ishant began making his own luck. The good balls did more in the air and off the pitch, but they were also fuller and closer to off stump, just as likely to draw an edge as a play-and-miss. And there were fewer bad balls – from his end and, in a well-deserved turn of luck, the opposite one too – so there were more catchers in place to gobble up the edges. In between came all the pleasing, in-between passages, like the over to Root, where he kept asking difficult questions to good batsmen offering solid responses.What does it take for a fast bowler to play 100 Test matches? Only ten players have ever done this – 11 if you include Jacques Kallis, who never had to bear a specialist fast bowler’s workload – and it’s quite a list: Anderson, Glenn McGrath, Courtney Walsh, Stuart Broad, Kapil Dev, Shaun Pollock, Wasim Akram, Makhaya Ntini, Ian Botham, Chaminda Vaas.That Ishant is about to join those names is a testament to his skill and durability, but it’s also vindication for all the selectors, captains and coaches who believed in his ability through his leanest periods. I mean, look at this for a stat:

Of all the players of his age, Ishant makes the best case – Rohit Sharma might be the batting equivalent – for selectors to pick players on potential and back them through thick and thin. In Ishant’s case, it helped that India weren’t always blessed with a plethora of alternatives in his early years, especially when it came to his particular blend of height, pace, movement and bounce. It also helped that he was prepared to bowl all day, in all sorts of conditions, and to learn and better himself.In the process, he’s overturned the narrative about his career. For a long time, it felt like he was struggling to meet the expectations that had been thrust onto him when he bowled that memorable spell to Ricky Ponting at the WACA as a 19-year-old. You could now say he’s exceeded them comfortably.In a way, Perth 2008 encapsulated everything that made the old Ishant so fascinating and frustrating: he kept beating the bat and kept making a top-class batsman look ungainly, but he wouldn’t have gotten Ponting out if he hadn’t extended his spell into a ninth over. And that, eventually, was his only wicket of the innings.Thirteen years on, Ishant is no longer just a towering, back-of-a-length bruiser. In his current avatar, he’s close to being the complete fast bowler, streamlined, skillful, and still young enough to make up for all the lean years and end up with a record that truly reflects how much he’s grown.

Why Tash Farrant's recall is a landmark moment for English women's cricket

Seamer’s return demonstrates improved pathway between domestic and international cricket

Matt Roller19-Feb-2021Life has not always been easy for those on the fringes of the England women’s set-up. The introduction of central contracts in 2014 heralded a new era of professionalism, but the lack of a full-time domestic structure to fall back on has led to some brutal conversations when players have been told that their deals will not be renewed.After a three-month grace period, with support from the ECB and the Professional Cricketers’ Association (PCA), those who have been released have been left to their own devices, with the choice of attempting to force their way back in through the amateur county system and, between 2016 and 2019, performances in the semi-pro Kia Super League, or leaving the game altogether. Twelve weeks after being international athletes, such players were paying match fees to represent their counties.In that context, the introduction of 41 new professional contracts in October and the overhaul of the women’s domestic structure in England and Wales were hugely significant events. Beth Langston, Tash Farrant and Alex Hartley – the three players to have lost central contracts in the past two years – are all now professionals again after several months out of the game, and have the platform to showcase their ability and press for England selection.In Farrant’s case, her return to international colours has come sooner than even she had expected. Upon her omission from the central contracts list in early 2019, Mark Robinson – England’s head coach at the time – said that “sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind” and admitted that Farrant was in an “unfortunate place” with her career at a crossroads.Related

  • ECB launches Regional T20 alongside Rachel Heyhoe Flint Trophy

  • 41 domestic players sign full-time regional contracts

  • Dodd, Halliday muscle New Zealand XI to warm-up victory

  • Farrant to tour New Zealand, Shrubsole out injured

  • NZ pick Halliday, 16-year-old Jonas for England ODIs

Two years later, she is with the England squad in New Zealand on the back of an impressive Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy season, and is pushing for a spot in the first ODI on Tuesday. Remarkably for a player who spent so long around the squad, it would be only her second cap in the format, more than seven years after she won her first as a 17-year-old.”When I lost my contract it was a bit like if you lost your contract then it was very hard to get back into the team,” Farrant said from her hotel room in Queenstown. “So initially, I wasn’t that positive on whether I’d be able to get back into the squad. But I think I knew within myself, deep down, even if I didn’t want to tell myself it, that I had some unfinished business in an England shirt.”It was massively disappointing. Obviously I loved playing for England, being in the squad and in the team. For me, it was the fact that there wasn’t really much to fall back on, so it did feel sort of a bit like it was the end of the world at the time. I won’t lie: I was very disappointed.”Tash Farrant admitted she “wasn’t expecting [an England recall] so soon”•Getty ImagesBut Farrant picked herself up and dusted herself down, finding a job as head of girls’ cricket at Trent College in Nottingham with some assistance from the former England batter Lydia Greenway. As well as coaching pupils herself, she was able to work closely with her colleague Scott Boswell – the former Leicestershire seamer, regrettably best known for suffering the yips in the 2001 C&G final – to help her make improvements in her own bowling, and she is said to have put on half a yard of pace over the last two years.The result is that she finds herself pushing for inclusion in Tuesday’s first ODI, battling with Kate Cross and Freya Davies for two spots alongside Katherine Brunt in the seam attack. If she does play, it will be a landmark moment, marking out the pathway from English domestic cricket to the international game.”When [the squad] was announced, I got some really lovely message from people like Alex Hartley, Beth Langston and Hollie Armitage,” Farrant said. “It gave people a bit of hope that even if they have been in a set-up and they’re now out of it… they know if they’re performing well in the Heyhoe Flint Trophy and the Hundred, which is on the big stage, they are putting their name in the hat.”If you are performing now at the domestic level, you are likely to put yourself in the ring for an England call-up. It did feel quite significant. It’s a marker that if you can perform at domestic level, then you can really push for an England spot and make the competition harder for the people in and around [the squad].”The uncapped Georgia Adams was the leading run-scorer in the inaugural Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy•PA Images via Getty ImagesPlayers whose involvement with the England set-up has been less frequent also have the chance to press their cases. Heather Knight, England’s captain, has mentioned her Western Storm team-mate Sophie Luff in dispatches on several occasions, while Georgia Adams – the leading run-scorer in the inaugural Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy – would have been a decent bet for inclusion on the New Zealand tour but for a shoulder injury.”The fact that Tash has worked so hard and those domestic contracts are in place has meant she’s been training [in the winter] when she potentially wouldn’t have done in previous years,” Knight said last month. “It’s just brilliant that if somebody does lose their contract, they can go back into that system. It’s a great example and it’s only going to help things in the future.”It’s been quite hard for some players because there hasn’t been a huge amount of cricket, but next summer if we have that full domestic season it gives those players a real chance to push their case and knock the door down.”And Knight will hope that the prospect of facing added competition from those outside the squad raises standards within her side. “It’s really healthy for us as an England side,” she said. “Sometimes that pressure from outside can bring out the best in the players that are in the team, so hopefully that is what happens.”Australia have set the gold standard in recent years, bringing through players like Beth Mooney, Sophie Molineux, Ash Gardner and Georgia Wareham on the back of their impressive performances in the WNCL and the WBBL. In the meantime, England’s core has remained largely constant, particularly with the bat: their most recent ODI debutant who has gone on to score even 100 career runs in the format was Lauren Winfield-Hill in 2013, who is now 30.In that context, it is clear why Farrant’s recall is significant not only for her, but for the English women’s game. England are still playing catch-up with Australia, but at their journey towards parity is now much clearer.

Pathum Nissanka defies the odds in his biggest test

Showing great maturity, the debutant shelved his attacking instincts to construct a century that could set up victory

Andrew Fidel Fernando25-Mar-2021Okay stop. Inhale. Pinch yourself. There are stories of a megaship stuck sideways in the Suez Canal. Niroshan Dickwella has batted responsibly. And a Sri Lankan debutant has hit a Test hundred. It’s been a weird day. Is any of this real? Are we in a fever dream?Sri Lanka batsmen fresh out of the domestic system just don’t do things like hit hundreds away from home in their second Test innings. They are not equipped to. The island’s first-class structure is a monument to incompetence and self-serving administration – obese with 24 teams, beset by pitches on which finger spinners pile up wickets like gardeners raking leaves after an afternoon thunderstorm, strung up occasionally by fixing allegations, and weakened by an annual exodus of senior pros preferring to try their luck in clubs overseas.For years, young Sri Lanka batsmen have been complaining that the gap between domestic cricket and internationals was an ever-widening chasm. That they felt, essentially, like they’d had swimming lessons in a paddling pool with a drunk instructor, before being thrown into a shark-infested eddy. It had been 20 years since Sri Lanka had a debutant centurion (Thilan Samaraweera having been the last, in 2001). The world’s least surprising stat.Related

Unpredictable Sri Lanka seek spark to seal first series win in the Caribbean

Thirimanne-Oshada stand scripts Sri Lanka's fightback

The Lahiru Thirimanne everyone had hoped for

Nissanka 103, Dickwella 96 set West Indies 375 for first-Test victory

And yet, there Pathum Nissanka was, through the end of day three and much of day four, quelling the kind of pace-heavy attack he would almost never have faced at home, defusing the Dukes ball’s seam movement on a quicker, bouncier track than he is accustomed to, trusting his defence, riding out spells, picking his scoring opportunities.It had to have helped that of all the batsmen who have graduated from domestic cricket, Nissanka has had the best recent track record – his first-class average of 67.54 not just the best among Sri Lanka batsmen, but the best in the world among current Test cricketers. Still, this is not a Shield average, or a Ranji average or even a county average. Decent batsmen score heavily in Sri Lanka’s Premier League Tournaments. This is not new. Then they arrive at the top level and well… it’s usually not pretty.Early in this Antigua innings, Nissanka was fixated on survival. He didn’t score until he faced his 21st ball, and he proceeded with extreme, self-denying caution after that, making just 18 from his first 70 deliveries. Only when West Indies’ bowlers erred seriously in line, did he venture boundaries – all square of the wicket – and only six in total, in a 252-ball stay.Even this was a departure; a mature acknowledgement that he wasn’t flaying spin at the Nondescripts Cricket Club grounds anymore, because although his defense is highly rated, he is far from dour in domestic cricket – his strike rate up at 69 in the last first-class season; 76 the season before that. In both those seasons he had averaged around 90.Even when he became more comfortable at the crease, Nissanka was aiming for immovable, rather than dominant. There were occasional close calls: one under-edge against Shannon Gabrial bounced centimetres short of the wicketkeeper’s gloves, plus at least two edges wide of slip. But although West Indies rifled through several plans of attack, Nissanka was never shaken out of his single-mindedness. Through the course of his 179-run sixth wicket stand with Dickwella, Nissanka frequently seemed like the senior partner.It is tempting to crown him Sri Lanka’s next great batting hope, the way Dinesh Chandimal, or Kusal Mendis once had been. But now that he is known in Test cricket, tougher examinations of his technique are about to begin. His weaknesses, of which there are bound to be some given the system from which he hails, will be exposed. It’s too soon to get hype, even if there was a promise of more to come in his no-big-deal century celebration.For now, it’s enough that Nissanka has had a taste of success at the highest level, And that in Antigua he has set his team up to push for a win.

How sustainable is KKR's innovative high-risk approach?

The team continues to push the boundaries of T20 cricket, but to have the right plans and attitude is only half the job

Sidharth Monga10-Oct-20213:04

David Hussey: ‘Cool and calm’ coach McCullum has been a major factor in KKR’s performance

Kolkata Knight Riders are the laboratory of T20 cricket. If there is an entity called a T20 hipster, they must find themselves drawn to Knight Riders. They do T20 the way many on the outside believe T20 ought to be done. The many on the outside have little to lose, though, which is what makes Knight Riders a commendable team. They continue to innovate and push the way those on the outside might but with skin in the game.Knight Riders’ batters play a certain role and get out, their bowlers are their “point-of-difference” players, they believe in hitting boundaries, they play some of the worst fielders because they are match-winners, they turn Sunil Narine into an opening batter, they invest heavily in mystery spin, left-arm wristspin and wristspin.Related

KKR vs RCB: Sharjah pitch and Russell fitness key factors in knockout bout

Stats – Royals' biggest IPL defeat, and Knight Riders' biggest win since 2008

How good or not has Eoin Morgan been as KKR captain? It's complicated

Look at some of the numbers. They have bowled 2359 balls of spin in the powerplay, the next highest is 1370. They have bowled 1333 balls of spin at the death, with the next highest 770. No team has employed as much left-arm wristspin as them, through Kuldeep Yadav and Brad Hogg. The two even played together. They have two mystery spinners playing together this year, having backed them during their tough times.Since their now-coach Brendon McCullum lit up the opening night of the IPL with that unbeaten 158 back in 2008, no other Knight Riders batter has scored a century; certain batters alone have scored more in losing causes in the IPL. No team that has played all seasons of the IPL has scored fewer half-centuries than Knight Riders’ batters. Their first instinct with anchor batters is likely to be to use them as a failsafe, at No. 7.Over the years they have tempered their approach at places. Shubman Gill’s strike-rate of 123 as opener has been given uncharacteristic tolerance, for one. Pat Cummins was preferred to Lockie Ferguson despite the latter’s better record in the format perhaps to justify the price tag on Cummins.Watch IPL on ESPN+ (US only)

IPL 2021 is available in the US on ESPN+. You can subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to KKR vs RCB in the eliminator here.

By and large, though, Knight Riders have stayed true to their philosophy. They have scored 62.6% of their runs in the IPL in boundaries, Mumbai at 60.2 are the only team in the 60s. No other team has had a season where they have taken fewer than five balls to hit a boundary; Knight Riders have had two.This year’s turnaround has been fashioned by typical Knight Riders moves. Their highest run-getter and wicket-taker this year were wasted by their previous teams, and were typical Knight Riders players. Varun Chakravarthy is an injury-prone ordinary fielder who can’t bat. R Ashwin picked him out of the Tamil Nadu Premier League and took him to Kings XI Punjab, but struggled to convince the owners of his bowling genius. India wouldn’t pick him because he couldn’t clear their fitness tests. Knight Riders got him, backed his mystery spin, and he and Narine are a terror now. His performances with the team have put him in India’s World Cup squad.Rahul Tripathi was a T20 hipster’s batter if ever there was one when he debuted for Rising Pune Supergiants. Opening the innings, he would lash out at everything in the powerplay, and lash out extra hard outside the powerplay. For his role was to maximise the powerplay, but after that bat like every ball is his last because they didn’t want to slow down with more proficient batters to follow. When Pune were done with the IPL, Rajasthan Royals for some reason tried to turn him into a lower-middle-order batter.Tripathi, and Royals, went nowhere. Knight Riders again got him and found him a spot where he can be most effective. On his part, Tripathi has worked on his game and improved in the middle overs and against spin. Among non-openers – openers have got themselves in by the time the middle overs start – Tripathi has the best strike-rate, 150, in the middle overs this IPL.Venkatesh Iyer, the other man to inject energy into their campaign in the second half of this IPL, was scouted and groomed by Knight Riders themselves. They used him as a bowler in the death overs too.Knight Riders play a high-risk game, which many on the outside believe is how T20 should be played, but with that have come their share of frustrations. In 2019, for example, they scored 66.42% of their runs in boundaries. Yet they failed to make the playoffs that year. In the real world, that matters. To have the right plans and attitude is only half the job. Their execution has not been that great. They might be one of the three teams to have won more than one IPL title, but this year is only the seventh time they have made it to the playoffs.If this approach doesn’t consistently give them a chance to win titles, the owners will have less tolerance for it. If this is how T20 ought to be played, it ought to succeed too. That is why it is important that Knight Riders got it right this season, but to finish fourth in a league of eight can be seen only as job half done.

Tireless Jadeja's control on lifeless pitch justifies Kohli's faith in team combination

India have left R Ashwin out for all four Tests so far, and India’s win at The Oval helped them shut out “outside noise”

Osman Samiuddin07-Sep-2021He didn’t play the innings of the match. That was played, arguably, by the Player of the Match Rohit Sharma; or if it is a mood-change we are measuring, then Shardul Thakur in the first innings. Umesh Yadav ended up with more wickets, and Jasprit Bumrah bowled the spell of the Test on the final day.Ravindra Jadeja did none of this and yet was absolutely central to India’s win at The Oval. This is just how he rolls. The two wickets of Haseeb Hameed and Moeen Ali were important but not as much as the sum of his bowling: 30 overs on a track aiding no bowler let alone one as prosaic as a slow left-armer, as many as 11 maidens and an economy rate of well under two. He bowled just under a third of the overs in the innings, which, in a five-man attack on one of the hottest days of the summer, is an important proportion given the load it took off the four quick bowlers.It becomes especially noteworthy because it came in the aftermath of the continued non-selection of R Ashwin. That has been one of the main talking points right through this series, but nowhere did it reach a higher pitch than at The Oval, when Virat Kohli revealed his Ashwin-less team at the toss.Related

  • Ravindra Jadeja, the quick and the deadly

  • 2-1, 2-2 or 3-1? India chase history, England look to avoid ignominy in one last squabble

  • England have looked outgunned and outplayed by India

  • Kohli: Among top three bowling performances I've seen as captain

  • Jasprit Bumrah happens. And England's challenge ends

A vast body of opinion – “the noise on the outside”, Kohli would later call it – thought India had erred. On the surface, The Oval hasn’t been, for the last decade at least, an especially spin-friendly Test surface. But spinners average 24 from day four onwards, the best for all grounds in England with more than a Test played since 2014. There has been something for spinners then, but it doesn’t change the fact that this Oval surface was not especially spin-friendly, either to the eye, or in numbers: seven wickets in all for 220 runs.Kohli’s reasoning at the toss only amplified that noise, in arguing that Jadeja’s match-up against England’s four left-hand batters was a good one. Ashwin’s record against left-hand batters, as we are regularly reminded, is freakishly good.4:32

Why did India promote Jadeja ahead of Rahane?

The more Ashwin has not been picked, however, the more it has seemed as if this is not a like-for-like comparison between the two, or even a trade-off. This has been about India looking for its best combination, an aim complicated by the emergence of Thakur, who would do well to retire now because four Tests in, his career all-round figures are so good they have only one direction to go in. If anything this three-into-two conundrum highlights, it is the depth that India enjoy.Jadeja offers a more solid batting option than Ashwin, which, with India’s middle order struggling as it has, is important. His being left-hand, as batting coach Vikram Rathour said, has helped break up an all right-hand top five. But the real issue is that Thakur has ended up scoring runs and taking wickets, and India have now won three and drawn one of their last five away Tests in Australia and England without Ashwin.”Within the group we know what we focus on and we take a collective call as to what feels like the best combination for us to walk on the field with,” Kohli said at the presentation after the game. “And whatever feels best balanced we just go ahead with it, and we believe we can win Tests with that bowling line-up or batting line-up. Whatever the noise on the outside we don’t bother with that. We just have belief in our group and we carry forward with that.”None of this should deflect from Jadeja’s actual performance with the ball. Final day or final innings – or a combination of both – are nervy occasions for spinners because of the pressure of expectations: this is where they make their name, if not their living. Wickets are crucial, of course, but in a fourth innings, with a side trying to bat out a draw or chase a win, control is as important.Monday wasn’t the first time for Jadeja though. He bowled 32 overs in the fourth innings at Lord’s in 2014, conceding just 53 as India defended 319 on a slow surface.Ravindra Jadeja ended with 11 maidens out of 30 overs, which included two wickets•AFP/Getty ImagesAt the MCG in 2018, on an even less responsive surface than The Oval, he wheeled out 32 economical overs in the fourth innings in another win. There is Jamaica 2019 and Galle 2017 too, and in only one has he not been the lone spinner. So when Rathour said on the fourth evening that India expected Jadeja to “play a massive role [on the final day]”, he wasn’t simply resorting to an easy soundbite.”[On] the fifth-day wicket, there is rough outside the left-hander’s off stump. So, he will play a massive role,” Rathour reasoned. “He bowled really well, I thought. He bowled with a lot of control, the last 5-6 overs he bowled did create a lot of opportunities.”This is what India expected and this is precisely what he did, hitting that rough relentlessly and ensuring, primarily, that he wasn’t going to cede runs. They could keep him out, or kick him away, but he wouldn’t let them score off him. Eleven maidens out of 30 is a high proportion, but it more or less matches his career rate: he bowls a maiden every three overs in the fourth innings. Of active Test bowlers, only Nathan Lyon, James Anderson and Stuart Broad have bowled more fourth-innings maidens; and all three with far lesser frequency.The wickets were the bonus and that, at the other end, the likes of Bumrah worked off him, feeding off the pressure, and creating their own magic.

With Pakistan, as always, expect lots of uncertainty and plenty of intrigue

Cancelled tours, late change of coaching staff and inclusion of old-timers have all lent a familiar touch of chaos and confusion

Danyal Rasool20-Oct-2021Big pictureThere’s a new chairman at the helm, the chief executive officer just resigned, as have the head coach and bowling coach. Of the 12 T20Is Pakistan scheduled against West Indies, New Zealand and England as warm-ups ahead of the T20 World Cup, they managed to play just one. Inclement weather put paid to much of the T20 series in the Caribbean, a security threat scuppered New Zealand’s tour, and a chaotic, much-criticised ECB decision to back out of visiting Pakistan saw that series go up in smoke.That sort of chaos isn’t ideal preparation for a World Cup, but Pakistan’s preparation for handling chaos is second to none. Their only T20 World Cup title, remember, came three months after a terror attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team that would end up depriving them of hosting any international cricket for the best part of the next decade. Things aren’t quite as bleak as that right now, but for a side that was ranked number one for much of this World Cup cycle, the path to silverware looks minefield-ridden right now.A few late changes have seen Pakistan opt for the conservative comfort blanket of experience, with Sarfaraz Ahmed, Shoaib Malik and Mohammad Hafeez all part of the travelling squad. They do boast arguably the fastest bowling contingent of the tournament with Haris Rauf, Shaheen Afridi and Hasan Ali amongst their ranks, alongside a handful of useful – if not legitimately world-class – spin options.Ultimately, though, Pakistan’s success might depend heavily on the nature of the pitches in the UAE. On slow, low pitches a side that opens with Mohammad Rizwan and Babar Azam might theoretically be ideally equipped to chase par totals, the pair’s consistency unmatched for opening pairs across all sides. Pitted against India, New Zealand and Afghanistan in what looks on paper like the more challenging group, even progression through to the semi-finals would be something of an achievement.Misbah-ul-Haq’s resignation as head coach came soon after their squad was announced•Getty ImagesRecent formThere isn’t too much of it thanks to those aforementioned cancellations. But what T20 cricket they have played has tended to produce results without being particularly eye-catching. West Indies were defeated in the one game that was completed, while a depleted South African side was beaten home and away this year. A 2-1 series win against Zimbabwe was perhaps the low point; Pakistan were bowled out for 99 chasing 119. It was followed by a 2-1 series defeat in England, where Pakistan see-sawed between sensational and distinctly mediocre.BattingIt has tended to be top-heavy, though not always for the worse. Rizwan’s record-breaking form stands out, and either he or Babar have gone on to build a substantial innings in almost every T20I Pakistan have played. Worryingly, though, what has followed them hasn’t been quite as impressive, with Pakistan trying a slew of power-hitters in the middle and death overs without any inspiring enough confidence to be considered nailed-on starters. Further evidence of that came in last-minute changes to the squad that saw Malik and Sarfaraz drafted in – though the more attacking Haider Ali was called up, too. But the general thrust of those changes towards cautious conservative conservatism does throw up questions about how committed Pakistan really are to modern, progressive T20 cricket.BattingWhile Pakistan’s pace bowling attack of Afridi, Hasan and Rauf is fearsome, whether the surfaces in the UAE will be conducive to high pace remains an open question. Mohammad Wasim could be something of a trump card, and was particularly impressive at the death in the UAE at the PSL. The pacers will likely need to rely on their variations, while also needing assistance from Pakistan’s litany of spin bowling options.In this department, they are exceptionally well served when it comes to quantity. Imad Wasim – who will likely open the bowling most games – is joined by Shadab Khan, Mohammad Nawaz, Hafeez and even Malik. What they possess in quantity, though, is perhaps counterbalanced by the absence of true quality. Shadab is – for now, anyway – nowhere near the bowler he was three years ago, while too many of the other options are makeshift, part-time bowlers. The absence of a genuine star in this department means Pakistan may need to rely on one of these to really step up their game over the next month.Haider Ali has an explosive game. Can he make a mark?•AFP/Getty ImagesPlayer to watch In a batting line-up deprived of the potential power-hitting of Azam Khan and Sohaib Maqsood, this would be an opportune time for Haider Ali to showcase the form that got him to this level. A delightfully sweet timer of the ball, his easy power belies his relatively slight frame. He was electric at last year’s PSL, and while the international stage didn’t work out for him initially, dropping down a level has brought solid results. He was the fifth highest scorer at the recently concluded National T20 Cup for Northern, averaging 63.40 at a strike rate of 146.75, and looking very much back to his best.Key questionDoes the fact that the T20 World Cup is in the UAE make Pakistan one of the favourites? For Pakistan fans to see the tournament played in a country where they’ve won the last 11 games and not begin to get carried away is a tall order. But reality must kick in at some point, so it’s also worth acknowledging Pakistan have changed head coaches twice since those heady days, and a lot of players aren’t quite at their career peaks in the way they were from 2016-18.Surfaces too will have a huge say on Pakistan’s fortunes. They’ve tended to be slow and low so far in the IPL season that finished most recently. With Pakistan bereft of the monstrous power hitters that, say, England or the West Indies can boast, having that taken out of the equation should mean the anchoring role players like Babar and Rizwan excel at becoming pivotal.Lots of uncertainty, plenty of intrigue. Pakistan wouldn’t have it any other way.Likely XI1 Mohammad Rizwan (wk) 2 Babar Azam (cap) 3 Fakhar Zaman 4 Haider Ali 5 Mohammad Hafeez 6 Mohammad Nawaz/Asif Ali 7 Shadab Khan 8 Hasan Ali 9 Imad Wasim 10 Mohammad Wasim/Haris Rauf 11 Shaheen Afridi

Game
Register
Service
Bonus